Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Rant 5 September 22, 2008


I was reading a book recently in which an American woman was having dinner in Rome with an Italian friend.  At another table a group of American tourists were being quite boisterous.  The friend asks, “why are you Americans always so loud”?  She answered, “because we don’t listen, that’s why we have George Bush”.

As it finally winds it way to a close, our epic presidential election seems to be devolving into more shouting than listening.

The hypocrisy of the Republicans is incredible.  They are implementing the old strategy of painting the Democratic candidate as an elitist and out of touch with the average person.  As hard as it is to believe, they are actually saying that the black man who grew up in a poor, single parent family on food stamps is the elitist and the man who is so wealthy that he does not even know how many homes he owns is the real champion of the common man.  McCain’s handlers correctly saw that Obama’s message for change was getting good traction with the electorate and so they simply co-opted the slogan and now McCain is running as the candidate for change.  They are even going so far as now portraying McCain as the real opponent of the entrenched Washington Republicans.  In the campaign ads it would appear that the long-time Washington insider and life-long republican, McCain is actually the reformer, not Obama.  The Palin appointment appears to be part of this latter strategy.

Their audacity leaves you breathless.  I am remained of the classic definition of chutzpah.  “A person who murders his parents and they appeals to the court for leniency because he is an orphan.”

My friend Dennis VanDyke, who I described in previous rants, has sent me a couple of pieces, attached, extolling the virtues of Sara Palin.  As most of you know I spent a number of years in Alaska and my fondness and affection for Alaska and Alaskans is nearly boundless.   In my experience many Alaskans demonstrate the admirable traits of independence, self-reliance and a willingness to take action when required.  From what I know about Palin I expect she has all these qualities and more.  I have seen a video of her firing a machine gun so I know that she is better with automatic weapons than I.  I did not see her on the tape of the West Virginia gun outing that I sent you earlier but she might have been there and I just have missed seeing her. 

The Palin move appears to have been inspired.  It certainly seems to have changed the game in the election.  Her candidacy even got a comment from my friend Sam Sanderson.  I have know Sam for 40 years and he is one of those people who you would say always has his feet firmly planted on the ground.  He does not often rise to the bait but once he has formed an opinion they are generally spot-on.  He often criticizes me as having my mind not only in the clouds but significantly higher than that.  In fact he criticizes me generally, but I still have great respect for his views.  Sam also holds those views tenaciously.  He is the one who led me to conclude that the Norwegians were the ones who originally gave lessons to the Dutch on how to be stubborn.  Sam was commenting on how an editorial by a Canadian journalist characterizing Palin as having a “white trash … porn actress look” was out of line.  Palin is definitely making news.

I expect Sara is a fine person but the problem is that she is not the candidate for President.  As Paris Hilton pointed out in her commercial for President, the old, wrinkly white haired dude is.


This is actually pretty good and someone put some real effort into it.  It is worth a view.

So everyone is basically running on the same platform and everyone is basically a good person.  (Or is it, everyone are basically good people?)   So what’s the problem?

For me, it is something my friend Donn Wonnell said at our last dinner.  He said, “Cynicism is not a basis for leadership”.  The Republicans are basically against everything that is wrong but I am having a hard time finding what they are actually for.  And to lead I think you have to be for something not simply against everything.

Obama is for a lot.  He even is attempting to make this election about issues and not just personalities.  I saw him on television last night saying that he believes that the American people can unify around solving the tough issues we face, that the country can in fact accept sacrifices and hard work to accomplish lofty goals.

Historically the Republicans have taken the position that everything would be just fine if the government would just stay out of people’s hair.  That less taxes and less regulation will take care of the economy and the free market will take care of everything else.  I think current event have made this manifestly untrue.  But to accept the alternative you have to believe that government can be effective and that great things can be accomplished when we act collectively in our own best interests.

The last time this happened in this country was in the 1930’s when Franklin Roosevelt led the country trough the depression and along the way established most of the social programs we now take for granted.  But to do that took a powerful orator and charismatic leader to unify the country in solving first the economic challenges and then the demands of WWII.  Could he have done it without the war?  I don’t know but he certainly was able to capture the imagination and the hopes of the vast majority of Americans.

Can Obama be that charismatic orator for today?  I just do not know.  There is a deep-seated distrust of government in the American psyche that the Republicans effectively tap into.  Benjamin Franklin once said, “no man’s life nor property is safe when the legislature is in session”.  Can we come together as a society to collectively reach goals that transcend our baser interests or have 70 years of splintering ourselves into ever more divided special interest groups made that impossible?

I guess the cynic would say no and the idealist would say yes.  I am saying yes.

I just hope that a majority of Americans can see that whatever the truth of the matter is that we need to try.  Obama has said that this is a “watershed election”.  I think he is right and that if he is not successful, we are doomed to an ever deepening of the chasms that divide us and the likelihood of our coming together as a society be further diminished.



------------ Forwarded Message: -------------- 
From: Susan Buckley-Holland <sbuckleyholland@bellsouth.net> 
To: Smith Peggy Jean <psmith36@bellsouth.net> 
Subject: Fwd: Yes sir, that's my baby! 
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 12:34:09 +0000 



This is too good to not pass on.  cb
Yes sir, that's my baby!













No comments:

Post a Comment